I haven’t posted much for a while, partly because I’ve been on holiday, and partly because I’m sick of “skeptics”. The naive kind with no concept of the real world because they don’t actually live in it.
I’m so disillusioned with the “Skeptic” community right now. It seems that not being a part of the concensus view makes you “a troll”, “a misogynist”, and so on that it’s not a movement I particularly want to be involved in right now. I’m more interested in real issues rather than the egos and manufactured problems of the most popular few.
However, I still feel strongly about secularism and science education, so will not be ignoring those topics away from this site.
Keep up to date with me on Facebook, and don’t forget to keep lobbying government, sharing the messages of reality and the importance of separating stupidity from politics.

11 Comments
Sad to hear but understandable. I’ve been enjoying reading your updates on FB and reading through the blog. Good luck on the break.
It’s the constant whinging from the likes of Watson, Sturgess, Benson et al.
I’m bored to tears of hearing about sexism in the skeptic community. It’s one of the reasons I’m stepping back from the movement for a while.
I believe in secularism, gay rights, women’s rights, science education, and promoting all of these as strongly as possible. REAL problems affecting the lives of millions of people, not the whining of a few internet celebrities who get pissed off about sexist jokes from time to time.
Is sexism an issue? Yes, but there are more important fish to fry, and once we make a dent in some of these issues then whingebags like Rebecca Watson and Kylie Sturgess might have a more valid point.
Until then I’d wish they shut up about their own personal agenda, making more of a problem than there really is, and actually try to promote some of the more important international work, such as that being done by Maryam Namazie and Ayaan Hirsi Ali etc… (and that’s just on the women’s rights issues – there are many more that need support…)
Thanks the posting……….I have enjoyed the site
All the best,
The Doubter
Sad, I enjoyed reading here, never commenting.
I’m probably missing what constitutes a skeptic, but I personally think it’s a division between science and anti-science. Kicking the butts of pseudoskeptics is a time honored sport.
I’d wish they shut up about their own personal agenda, making more of a problem than there really is, and actually try to promote some of the more important international work, such as that being done by Maryam Namazie and Ayaan Hirsi Ali etc
You include me in that “they” so I have to ask – have you read my blog at all, or the articles on my website? I’ve done a lot of promoting of both Maryam Namazie and Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
Yes, Ophelia, I have read it, i’ve met you, and seen you speak: and it’s often been very good.
However, lately, it seems that even you have gone on far more often than ever about “sexism in skepticism” than before. I know it exists, and i’m not an apologetic for individual’s behaviour, but I am more interested in tackling more important problems first. (Like the muslim council’s treatment of women in my home country).
Watson has made it her personal agenda of the last year or 2 to hijack every potentially helpful sceptical conference, and push her agenda on this issue, and the last few weeks it seemed as though you were doing little else also.
The “Skeptic Movement” ceases to be focused on skepticism when it promotes any conclusion. Ideology, any ideology, is a conclusion as to how things ought to be. Skepticism is about facts and reality. Not being sold on some idea of Utopia, that can never be. For a group that claims to be promoting critical-thinking, they reach some dubious conclusions, asserted without evidence. Asking for evidence is a crime against Feminism. We have lots of evidence for what happens to those who analyze the Gnu Feminism. Especially if you’re female. ERV has been excommunicated as pandering to MRA’s. Stef was publicly excoriated for acknowledging that she welcomed invitations to converse with men over coffee. Even if it leads to intimacy.
If RW met the risen Christ in that elevator, would PZ Myers be spreading the Gospel? Of course! To question her testimony is blasphemy (misogyny). Proof that you’re the spawn of Satan (privileged)
Her latest screed depends on re-writing history. The Tweet never mentioned an elevator. She didn’t mildly rebuke EG. She launched a public crusade at the CFI event, her “Privilege Delusion” post declaring her personal boycott of Dawkins and encouraging others to do the same, her follow-up hateful video when the story changed to her getting “cornered” and smiting men to find other ways to get their rocks off.
Do the terrorized victims of sexual assault voluntarily carouse unfamiliar locations until dawn if a chance interaction with a polite stranger induces panic attacks? If you DO want to be hit on, where are your best chances? Spending the hours between midnight and 4am where there are 20 drunk men for every drunk woman is a sure-fire bet! Saying you need to get some sleep when it is obviously not on your priority list is silly. Even people who don’t care about sleeping have turned in hours ago.
If the elevator situation is showcased to the public as a serious transgression, why did the more egregious examples now emerging fail to be mentioned until a year later? An anonymous survey specifically soliciting feedback about the personal perceptions of the event while it’s fresh on your mind is pretty much ideal.
Now I want to go to TAM! Interesting that people did mention Rebecca’s attention-seeking drama known as “Elevatorgate” DID make note of it. Yes, Rebecca has ruined TAM for a lot more skeptics that womanizing men could possibly hope to. I’m a female who won’t suffer through listening to Rebecca just to get to whatever good content might be generated by the SGU podcast. Yay! I’ll listen to the “Live from TAM” this year. Maybe I’ll enjoy the show for once.
Audio of a very good blog by http://www.SkepticalAbyss.com
http://youtu.be/KuKdQyeyuS8
I sincerely hope you enjoy your break and come back refreshed. I’ve only recently discovered your blog (ironically through researching the whole Watson fiasco!) and have enjoyed reading through your past posts. The abuse you and others have suffered for daring to question the motives of Rebecca Watson and her camp is symptomatic of a division that they themselves have created. Supporters have noted that she only took a “Guys, don’t do that” approach on her original elevator YouTube post, and that this was suddenly twisted into an anti-man rant. To a certain extent this was true. However, she fully endorsed, encouraged and enjoyed the subsequent controversy as she marshalled her forces for what she clearly saw as an opportunity to promote her own militant agenda.
Her previous history of ban(s) from the JREF forums and behaviour upon them demonstrates the type of person she really is – an immature attention seeker with an overblown sense of self worth. Her behaviour at conferences equally damns her. People have paid to attend these and to realise that your hard earned cash results in a poorly rehearsed, stilted and quite probably still drunk presentation from her is appalling. I have yet to read anything of value published by her and am at a loss as to what she has actually brought to skepticism.
I apologise for the rant, but I hate to think that this fool has been responsible for any ill-feeling you may have towards the “movement” (I despise that term…), and hope you realise you have my and others’ support and best wishes for the future.
Thank you, Graf, kind words like yours might just help me come back.
coffeelovingskeptic.com is a one of the more impressive blogs I’ve seen. Thanks so much for keeping the internet classy for a change. Youve got style, class, bravado. I mean it. Please keep it up because without the internet is definitely lacking in intelligence.
One Trackback
… [Trackback]…
[...] There you will find 1951 more Infos: coffeelovingskeptic.com/?p=1535 [...]…